TalkLeft
Sure, the flip flop attack probably won’t cost Obama the election. But why not ask yourself this, why feed the line of attack in the first place? Maybe Obama is not really hurt by the flip flopper line, but please tell me how exactly it helps?
It seems to me that “Two Faced” fits Obama better that the cutesy ‘flip-flop’ phrase
To me, the “it probably won’t hurt him” line of defense misses the point. Explain to me instead, how the flip flops HELP Obama? Because, wrap it up in pretty packaging all you want, but Obama DID flip flop on FISA capitulation. Obama did change his position on public financing (I see all the upside to this one BTW, I just think he should have done it earlier), Obama has given strange and contradictory statements on choice. Given these mistakes, it was inevitable it seems to me to see the Media take Obama’s use of “refine” on Iraq and make up a story - that Obama changed his position on Iraq withdrawal too. That one was flat out false, but the others were not. Obama created the opening, for no good reason. That is the point. It may not be potent, but it should not even exist.
By Big Tent Democrat
Looks like the ‘Left’ is admitting Barack talks out of both face’s.
Analysis: Obama’s centrist emphasis gives GOP ammo
Slowly and subtly, Barack Obama is wiping out every reason to vote …
“The passing of the spatula”
Hot Air Article
ShareThis
